Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
This study aims to determine the respondent's perception of the economic impact of the existence of the Kemantren Tourism Village and to find out how big the economic impact of tourism activities in the Kemantren Tourism Village is on the economy of the local community. The method used is descriptive quantitative. The analytical method used is descriptive analysis and multiplier effect. The results showed that the perception of respondents stated the interpretation of "Strongly agree" and "Agree" to the statement regarding the economic impact of the existence of the Tourism Village Kemantren. And the economic impact of tourism activities includes a direct impact of Rp 182,285,708 per month, an indirect impact of IDR 111,452,222 per month, and a follow-up impact of Rp 28,400,218. Meanwhile, the total economic leakage is Rp 7,692,230,000 per month. The multiplier effect results show that the keynesian income multiplier value is 0.1, the type I income multiplier ratio is 1.6 and the type II income multiplier ratio is 1.8. With the keynesian income multiplier value of 0.1, it shows that the Tourism Village of Kemantren has a low economic impact on the economy of the local community.
References
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), “Statistik Perkembangan Pariwisata dan Transportasi Nasional Desember 2018,” Ber. Resmi Stat., pp. 1–16, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2019/02/01/1543/jumlah-kunjungan-wisman-ke-indonesia-desember-2018-mencapai-1-41-juta-kunjungan.html.
Bank Indonesia, “Jumlah Devisa Sektor Pariwisata (Miliar US $),” Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), 2018. https://www.bps.go.id/linkTableDinamis/view/id/960.
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), “Jumlah Perjalanan Wisatawan Nusantara 2018 Tumbuh 12%,” Databoks, 2019. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2019/07/03/jumlah-perjalanan-wisatawan-nusantara-2018-tumbuh-12.
Kemenparekraf, “Peraturan Menteri Pariwisata dan Kebudayaan Nomor: KM.18/HM.001/MKP/2011 Tentang Pedoman Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) Mandiri Pariwisata,” Kementeri. Pariwisata dan Kebud., pp. 1–40, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://www.kemenparekraf.go.id/asset_admin/assets/uploads/media/old_all/2_ PERMEN_TENTANG_PEDOMAN_PNPM_2013.pdf.
A. A. I. Andayani, E. Martono, and M. Muhamad, “Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Melalui Pengembangan Desa Wisata Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Ketahanan Sosial Budaya Wilayah (Studi Di Desa Wisata Penglipuran Bali),” Ketahanan Nas., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2017, doi: doi:https://doi.org/10.22146/jkn.18006.
H. Hermawan, “Dampak Pengembangan Desa Wisata Nglanggeran Terhadap Ekonomi Masyarakat Lokal,” Pariwisata, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 105–117, 2016, doi: doi:https://doi.org/10.31294/par.v3i2.1383.
I. T. D. Pamungkas and M. Muktiali, “Pengaruh Keberadaan Desa Wisata Karangbanjar Terhadap Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan, Ekonomi Dan Sosial Masyarakat,” Tek. PWK (Perencanaan Wil. Kota), vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 361–372, 2015.
I. N. Subadra and N. M. Nadra, “Dampak Ekonomi, Sosial budaya, Dan Lingkungan Pengembangan Desa Wisata Di Jatiluwih-Tabanan,” Manaj. Pariwisata, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 46–64, 2006.
H. Umar, Metode Penelitian untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 1996.
Marine Ecotourism for Atlantic Area (META-Project), Planning For Marine Ecotourism in The EU Atlantic Area. Bristol: University of The West of England, 2001.
E. Wolok, “Analisis Dampak Ekonomi Wisata Hiu Paus Terhadap Pendapatan Masyarakat Batubarani Gorontalo. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan,” Ekon. Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 136–143, 2016, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jebik.v5i2.17146.
A. Dritasto and A. A. Anggraeni, “Analisis Dampak Ekonomi Wisata Bahari Terhadap Pendapatan Masyarakat di Pulau Tidung,” Online Inst. Teknol. Nas., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2013.