Interaksi Strategi Pembelajaran dan Gaya Kognitif Terhadap Hasil Belajar
Keywords:
Internet reciprocal teaching, Direct Instruction, Field independent, field dependent, hasil belajarAbstract
Pemilihan strategi pembelajaran yang melibatkan karakteristik belajar pebelajar perlu dipertimbangkan. Sehingga efektifitas pembelajaran khususnya dalam peningkatan hasil belajar bisa dioptimalkan. Penelitian ini menggunakan dua strategi pembelajaran yaitu internet reciprocal teaching dan direct instruction. Sedangkan karakteristik belajar pebelajar menggunakan gaya kognitif (field independent dan field dependent). Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk melihat interaksi strategi pembelajaran dan gaya kognitif. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dan dirancang dengan rancangan eksperimen semu (quasi experiment). Desain yang digunakan adalah desain faktorial 2x2 dengan rancangan Non-equivalent Control Group Design. Simpulan dari penelitian ini adalah penerapan strategi internet reciprocal teaching pada gaya kognitif field independence memiliki hasil belajar yang paling tinggi. Penelitian ini juga menunjukkan bahwa pebelajar yang memiliki gaya kognitif field independence hasil belajarnya lebih baik dibandingkan pebelajar yang memiliki gaya kognitif field dependence.
References
Anderson, T., and Garrison, D. R. (1998). Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. In C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance Learners in Higher Education. Atwood Publishing.
Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. In International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149
Berger, E., & Goldberger, L. (1979). Field dependency and short-term memory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 87–96.
Bohang, F. K. (2018, February). Berapa Jumlah Pengguna Internet Indonesia? Kompas.Com. https://tekno.kompas.com/read/2018/02/22/16453177/berapa-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia
Castek, J., & Coiro, J. (2010). Measuring online reading comprehension in open networked spaces: Challenges, concerns, and choices. Symposium A Quarterly Journal In Modern Foreign Literatures.
Chinien, C. A., & Boutin, F. (1993). Cognitive style FD/I: An important learner characteristic for educational technologists. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 21(4), 303–311.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research; Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Davis, J. K. (1991). Educational implications of field-dependence-independence. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Degeng, I. N. S. (2013). Ilmu Pembelajaran: Klasifikasi Variabel untuk Pengembangan Teori dan Penelitian. Aras Media.
Djaali. (2014). Psikologi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
Dogruer, N., Eyyam, R., & Menevis, I. (2011). The use of the internet for educational purposes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28(December), 606–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.115
Ekayana, A. (2015). Pemanfaatan Internet Sebagai Salah Satu Sumber Belajar Siswa dan Guru di Jurusan Teknik Elektronika. Jptk Undiksha, 12(2), 121–130.
Jefferies, P., & Hussain, F. (1998). Using the Internet as a teaching resource. Education + Training, 40(8), 359–365.
Kagan, D. M. (1987). Cognitive style and instructional preferences: Some inferences. Educational Forum. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728709335718
Leu, D. J., Zawilinski, L., Forzani, E., & Timbrell, N. (2014). Best Practices in Teaching the New Literacies of Online Research and Comprehension. 343–364.
Liu, & Reed, W. M. (1994). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 10(4), 419–434.
McVerry, J., Zawilinski, L., & O’Byrne, W. (2009). Navigating the Cs of Change. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/sept09/vol67/num01/Navigating-the-Cs-of-Change.aspx#article
Reigeluth, C. M., & Beatty, B. (2017). Instructional-Design Theories and Models, Volume IV: The Shift to Learner-Centered Instruction. Taylor and Francis.
Setiyani, R. (2010). Pemanfaatan Internet Sebagai Sumber Belajar. Dinamika Pendidikan, V(2), 117–133. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/61217-ID-pemanfaatan-internet-sebagai-sumber-bela.pdf%0Ahttp://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/DP/article/view/4921
Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Thorwat, S. R. (2018). ICT in Higher Education : Opportunities of Urban Colleges and Challenges of Tribal Colleges Introduction : International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(5), 1–6.
Witkin, H. A. (1978). Cognitive styles in personal and cultural adaptation. Clark University.
Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins. International Universities Press.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047001001
Woolfolk, A. (2008). Educational Psychology: Active Learning Edition (10th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Aan Nurfahrudianto, Vivi Ratnawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
