PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID 19 DALAM MENINGKATKAN AKTIVITAS DAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN PRODUK KREATIF DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN
PDF

Keywords

Problem Based Learning (PBL), Learning Activities, Learning Outcomes
Problem Based Learning (PBL), Aktivitas Belajar, Hasil Belajar

How to Cite

Fuadi, A. S. ., & Muchson, M. . (2020). PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID 19 DALAM MENINGKATKAN AKTIVITAS DAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN PRODUK KREATIF DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen, Ekonomi Dan Akuntansi, 5(1), 23–33. Retrieved from https://proceeding.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/senmea/article/view/225

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to see the increase in learning activeness and learning outcomes of class XII students in Creative Products and Entrepreneurship subjects at SMK Hidayatus Sholihin using the Problem Based Learning (PBL) learning implementation model. This research is a classroom action research (classroom action research) to solve problems in the classroom. The research was conducted in three cycles and each cycle was carried out a reflection on the action given. The data technique used observation sheets, learning outcomes tests, and documentation. The data analysis technique is using quantitative quantitative analysis techniques. The results showed that the implementation of learning using the Problem Based Learning learning model can improve learning activeness and learning outcomes of class XII students on PKK subjects at SMK Hidayatus Sholihin. This can be seen from the activeness of students from the first cycle of 62.01%, an increase to 76.30% in the second cycle and an increase in the third cycle of 80.19%. The learning outcomes of students' knowledge can be seen from the class average score in cycle I of 76 with a 50% proportion of completeness and an increase in the second cycle of the class average to 80 with the proportion of completeness of 64% and an increase in cycle III the class average to 84 with the proportion of completeness 86%.

PDF

References

A.M, Sardiman. 2006. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar-Mengajar. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Amir, M. Taufik. 2009. Inovasi Pendidikan Melalui Problem Based Learning. Jakarta: Kencana

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2012). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Daryanto. 2011. Manajemen Pemasaran: Sari Kuliah. Bandung: Satu Nusa.

Hamdu & Agustina. (2011). Pengaruh motivasi belajar siswa terhadap prestasi belajar IPA di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan. Vol 12 No.1 April 2011

Kunandar. 2008. Langkah Mudah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Sebagai Pengembangan Profesi Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Kusumah, Wijaya dan Dedi Dwitagama. 2010. Mengenal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT INDEKS.

Marno dan M. Idris. 2010. Strategi dan Metode Pengajaran. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media

Santoso, dkk. 2013. Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah pada Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Strategi Master dan Penerapan Scaffolding. Unnes Journal Mathematic Education Research. Vol 2. No 2. ISSN: 2252-6455. Semarang: Progam Studi Matematika, Program Pascasarjana

Siregar. Syofian. 2014. Metode penelitian kuantitatif dilengkapi dengan perbandingan perhitungan manual dan SPSS. Jakarta: Kencana.

Trianto (2009).Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Progresif.Surabaya:Kencana

Yamin, Martinis. 2007. Profesionalisasi Guru & Implementasi KTSP. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press.