The Strategies of Teaching Writing to Promote Creativity at University of Nusantara PGRI Kediri

Authors

  • Dwi Rahma Wati University of Nusantara PGRI Kediri
  • Hovando Febryan Christoper University of Nusantara PGRI Kediri
  • Narendra Sollahuddin University of Nusantara PGRI Kediri
  • Rayo Septyansah University of Nusantara PGRI Kediri
  • El Radit Dzaniel University of Nusantara PGRI Kediri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29407/t0s38253

Keywords:

Essay writing, creativity indicators, writing assessment, learning process, case study

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the instructional process and assessment of an Essay Writing course, specifically examining the integration of technical Writing and ideational Creativity indicators. Employing a qualitative case study design, data were collected from one lecturer and six students categorized into high, medium, and low achievement groups through semi-structured interviews, classroom observation, and document analysis of lesson plans and student essays. The study utilized data triangulation to ensure validity. Findings reveal a discrepancy between the formal lesson plan and classroom implementation, particularly where low-achieving students frequently          neglected         the            pre-writing      planning          stage.   The      analysis demonstrates that technical Writing competencies, such as organization and grammar, serve as essential prerequisites for Creativity. Students who mastered     technical foundations     demonstrated higher originality    and elaboration, whereas those who bypassed the planning phase failed to produce creative content due to cognitive overload on technical errors. The study concludes that effective essay writing instruction must strictly enforce pre-writing stages to bridge the gap between technical proficiency and creative ideation, ensuring that creativity is grounded in appropriate academic structure.

References

Dugan, K., Mosyjowski, E., Daly, S., & Lattuca, L. (2021). Systems thinking assessments in engineering: A systematic literature review. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2808 Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 31–74.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.

Kaufer, D. (1986). Composing Written Sentences. Research in The Teaching of English, 20.

Kellogg, R. (2001). Competition for working memory among writing processes. The American Journal of Psychology, 114(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423513

Singh, C., Ong, E., & Singh, T. (2019). Redesigning Assessment for Holistic Learning. The Journal of Social Sciences Research.

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677–688. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Scholastic Testing Service.

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press.

Published

2026-08-12

How to Cite

The Strategies of Teaching Writing to Promote Creativity at University of Nusantara PGRI Kediri. (2026). ELTT, 11(1), 211-219. https://doi.org/10.29407/t0s38253

Similar Articles

1-10 of 141

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.