The Degradation of Student Communication Ethics on Instagram and TikTok: A Case Study at Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29407/egngrn46Abstract
The rapid development of digital technology has fundamentally transformed students' communication patterns, particularly on social media platforms such as Instagram and TikTok. Despite growing scholarly attention to digital communication, limited studies have examined ethics degradation specifically within Indonesian academic communities using sociological frameworks. This study addresses that gap by examining the phenomenon of communication ethics degradation among students of Nusantara PGRI University Kediri (UNP Kediri), focusing on interactions within the comment sections of these two platforms. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through non-participant observation and semi-structured interviews. The findings reveal that students frequently engage in personal attacks, destructive sarcasm, negative labeling, and digital polarization when confronted with differing opinions. Drawing on Durkheim's framework of organic solidarity and anomie, these behaviors reflect a crisis of moral regulation within the digital academic community, driven by individual factors such as limited self-regulation, institutional gaps in digital ethics education, and structural factors including the algorithmic architecture of social media platforms. This study contributes a sociological lens to understanding digital ethics degradation in higher education, concluding that such degradation is not merely a linguistic issue but a symptom of weakening organic solidarity that demands systematic educational intervention.
Keywords:
Communication ethics, social media, digital anomie, organic solidarity, DurkheimDownloads
References
Aprilianata, A., Mahendra, W., & Ramadhan, I. (2025). Dua Dekade Trend Penelitian Kewarganegaraan Digital: Analisis Bibliometrik Database Scopus (2004-2024). Journal of Moral and Civic Education, 9(1), 88-107.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Durkheim, É. (1893). The division of labour in society. Free Press.
Durkheim, É. (1897). Suicide: A study in sociology. Free Press.
Johannesen, R. L. (2001). Ethics in human communication (5th ed.). Waveland Press.
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760.
Mutiarani, U. P., Karimah, I. N., & Syarafa, Y. P. (2024). Etika komunikasi dalam penggunaan media sosial di kalangan mahasiswa. Jurnal Harmoni Nusa Bangsa, 1(2).
Nasrullah, R. (2015). Media sosial: Perspektif komunikasi, budaya, dan sosioteknologi. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Ramadhanti, T. M. S., Kaban, A. G., Permata, D., Putri, S. M., Ramadhadi, M. R., & Harahap, N. (2024). Etika komunikasi dalam bermedia sosial bagi Gen Z. Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, dan Humaniora, 2(8), 252–259.
Ritzer, G. (2012). Teori sosiologi: Dari sosiologi klasik sampai perkembangan terakhir postmodern. Pustaka Pelajar.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi Revisi). Alfabeta.
Taslim, M., Suherli, S., & Rusdin, F. (2024). Pola komunikasi mahasiswa di platform digital: Studi kasus perbedaan pendapat isu politik. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Komunikasi Digital, 5(1), 44–58.
Yuniani, H., Indarsih, M., Astuti, F. D., & Bakiyah, H. (2023). Revitalisasi etika komunikasi media sosial dalam membangun budaya Indonesia yang luhur dan beradab. Jurnal Public Relations (J-PR), 4(1), 23–30.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Farida Putri Aprilia Helistri Arinda, Alin Rahmania, Irmayanti Anggraini Mustika Sari, Devi Ika Yustika Ananda Putri, Allyn Joanetta Cahya Autrian, Maulydina Rahayu (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.