Human and Generative Artificial Intelligence Collaboration in Academic Writing for Lecturers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29407/pwzh8z16Abstract
The development of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has transformed academic writing practices in higher education. However, existing studies mainly focus on the benefits and risks of AI use, while limited attention has been given to how humans and AI collaboratively produce academic knowledge. This study aims to examine Human-AI Collaboration in faculty academic writing, identify the distribution of cognitive roles between humans and GenAI, and develop a conceptual model that supports both academic productivity and research integrity. A qualitative approach employing an Integrative Literature Review was used to analyze studies published between 2022 and 2026. Thematic synthesis was conducted on literature related to Generative AI, Human-AI Collaboration, Augmented Intelligence, Responsible AI, and academic writing. The findings reveal that GenAI has evolved from a technical writing assistant into a cognitive partner that supports idea generation, knowledge processing, manuscript development, and revision. The study proposes a conceptual Human-AI Collaboration model in which humans retain epistemic control through human oversight, while GenAI functions as an augmentative system. The model highlights that academic productivity, research integrity, and Responsible AI are interconnected dimensions of knowledge production in the GenAI era
Keywords:
Generative AI, Human-AI Collaboration, Academic Writing, Responsible AI, Higher EducationDownloads
References
Alamri, W., Qasem, F., Alfotais, A., & Taisan, H. Al. (2025). Leveraging ChatGPT AI Model in Academic Writing and Avenues for Further Development: SWOT Framework. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i2.8218
Association, S. (2023). International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. STM guidelines on the use of generative AI technologies. https://www.stm-assoc.org/2023_08_07_STM_Generative_AI_White_Paper.pdf
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Chen, S. (2025). The Role of Religion as an Informal Institution in Shaping Corporate Environmental Responsibility: A SWOT Analysis of Publicly Listed Companies in Religiously Diverse Regions. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 159(1), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.19760
Committee on Publication Ethics. (2023). Authorship and AI tools. Committee on Publication Ethics.
Dellermann, D., Ebel, P., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2019). Hybrid intelligence. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(5), 637–643.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Elsevier. (2023). The use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in writing for Elsevier. Elsevier.
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474.
Halawa, I. K. (2025). AI Untuk Karya Ilmiah Dosen: Menjaga Mutu dan Keaslian. Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Dan Teologi Indonesia, 3(2), 429–444.
Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577–586.
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., & Hüllermeier, E. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
Mondal, H., & Mondal, S. (2023). ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71(12), 3600–3606.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15.
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367.
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Iman Kristina Halawa (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
