TPS-Webbed Inclusive Learning Model: An Integrated Pedagogical Innovation for Enhancing 21st-Century Competencies among Elementary School Students with Disabilities

Authors

  • Novi Nitya Santi Elementary School Teacher Education Study Program (PGSD), Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri Indonesia Author
  • Kurniawan Wahyu Pratama Elementary School Teacher Education Study Program (PGSD), Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29407/w9dqz312

Abstract

Inclusive education in elementary schools requires pedagogical innovations that accommodate learner diversity while enabling meaningful participation and the development of competencies needed in the twenty-first century. This conceptual study proposes the TPS-Webbed Inclusive Learning Model, which integrates Think Pair Share (TPS), the Webbed thematic approach, and inclusive pedagogy. The model is intended primarily for inclusive elementary classrooms serving students with disabilities who can participate in shared classroom activities with individualized supports, including students with mild intellectual disabilities, specific learning difficulties, communication and language needs, hearing or visual impairments, physical disabilities, and other access needs. An integrative literature review and conceptual synthesis were conducted using a documented search and screening procedure. Searches were designed around four concept clusters: inclusive education/disability, cooperative learning/TPS, thematic-integrated/Webbed learning, and twenty-first-century competencies/4Cs. Sources were screened for conceptual relevance, peer-reviewed or authoritative status, educational context, and contribution to model construction. The resulting model specifies six phases; Thematic Orientation, Think, Pair, Share, Collaborative Elaboration, and Reflection and Inclusive Assessment, and embeds accessibility supports, assistive technology options, multimodal communication, and alternative response modes throughout the sequence. The model also defines observable indicators for critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity and proposes inclusive assessment criteria emphasizing progress, participation, access, and quality of performance rather than a single response mode. Because the model has not yet undergone expert validation or classroom testing, its expected effects are presented as theoretical propositions rather than demonstrated effectiveness. The contribution of the model is therefore conceptual: it combines thematic curriculum organization with structured peer interaction and disability-responsive access within one instructional architecture

Keywords:

TPS-Webbed Inclusive Learning Model, Inclusive Education, Students with Disabilities, 21st-Century Competencies, Elementary School

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587

Binkley, M., et al., (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 17–66). Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2

Care, E. et al., (2019). Education system alignment for twenty-first century skills: Focus on assessment. Brookings Institution. United States of America. COI: 20.500.12592/ggpg59.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. L. (2020). Integrated curriculum as an effective way to teach twenty-first century capabilities. Routledge. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:117607220

Florian, L. (2019). On the necessary co-existence of special and inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(7–8), 691–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1622801

Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2019). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 45(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.501096

Fogarty, R. (2020). How to integrate the curricula (4th ed.). Corwin Press. https://www.sagepub.com/shop/buy-a-book/how-to-integrate-the-curricula-3-229128

Johnson, P. (2019). Joining Together Group Theory and Group Skills by David W. Johnson and Frank P. Johnson. Groupwork, 27(3), 110–111. https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v27i3.1263

Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0

Mertens, D. M. (2020). Designing Qualitative and Mixed Methods Evaluations for Transformative Impact. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529770278.n73

Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2021). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.

N. Nityasanti, A. Laila, S. Sahari, V. Iswantiningtyas, and R. I. Khan. (2023). Post- Pandemic Independent Learning Assistance Model for Improving Students’ Academic and Socio-Personal Competence: Campus on Duty (COD) Program, In Indonesia. Qubahan Acad. J., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 332–341. https://doi.org/10.58429/qaj.v3n4a177

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. OECD Publishing.

Prastowo, A. (2019). Analisis Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu. Kencana. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=jeCxDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=related:xqmkv0y8n9kJ:scholar.google.com/&ots=KVBesKzFej&sig=aptQZoHkGxrHvgsR92vTcTrvtbc

Pratama, K. W., Roesminingsih, M. V., & Suhanadji, S. (2022). Strategi peningkatan motivasi belajar di masa pandemi Covid-19 berdasarkan pemetaan menurut teori motivasi McClelland pada siswa kelas V SD Labschool UNESA 2. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains Sosial, dan Agama, 8(1), 322-338. https://doi.org/10.53565/pssa.v8i1.488

Sharma, U., Forlin, C., & Loreman, T. (2022). Impact of training on pre-service teachers’ attitudes and concerns about inclusive education and sentiments about persons with disabilities. Disability & Society, 37(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590802469271

Slavin, R. E. (2020). Cooperative Learning: Teori Riset dan Praktik. Nusamedia.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2021). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.

UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education—All means all. UNESCO Publishing.

United Nations. (2023). The sustainable development goals report 2023. United Nations.

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2021). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for twenty-first century competencies: Implications for curriculum design. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1865281

Walton, E., & Rusznyak, L. (2021). Developing inclusive pedagogies in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103192

Westwood, P. (2021). Commonsense methods for children with special educational needs (8th ed.). Routledge.

Yuwono, I., & Mirnawati. (2022). Inclusive education practices in Indonesian elementary schools: Challenges and opportunities. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 11(2), 245–256.

Zhao, Y. (2021). Learners without borders: New learning pathways for all students. Corwin Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

How to Cite

Santi, N. N. . ., & Pratama , K. W. . (2026). TPS-Webbed Inclusive Learning Model: An Integrated Pedagogical Innovation for Enhancing 21st-Century Competencies among Elementary School Students with Disabilities. Proceedings of the Conference on International Visions and Transformative Actions for Society, 1, 899-908. https://doi.org/10.29407/w9dqz312

Similar Articles

51-60 of 66

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.