Israel's Genocidal Intent: South Africa's Claim at the ICJ Based on Forensic Linguistic Analysis

Authors

  • Izharulhak bin Saiful Hafni Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri Indonesia Author
  • Jarot Wahyudi UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29407/w1665963

Abstract

This paper examines South Africa's application to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on 29 December 2023, which alleges Israel has breached its obligations under the 1948 Genocide Convention in relation to Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. The study focuses on the contention that public statements by Israeli officials demonstrate genocidal intent, specifically direct and public incitement to commit genocide as per Article III(c) of the Convention. The primary objective is to employ forensic linguistic analysis to identify and scrutinise linguistic markers indicative of dolus specialis (specific intent to destroy a protected group, in whole or in part) within these pronouncements and to discuss their implications for the ICJ case. This research utilises a qualitative content analysis methodology, with a forensic linguistic approach, applied to official and public statements by senior Israeli officials (including the Prime Minister, President, and Defence Minister) made between October 2023 and April 2024. Data are drawn from South Africa's ICJ application, reports from human rights organisations such as Amnesty International, and verified transcripts. The analysis identifies key linguistic patterns, including dehumanisation (e.g., "human animals"), collective attribution of responsibility (e.g., "an entire nation out there that is responsible"), and symbolic, potentially annihilatory references (e.g., the invocation of 'Amalek'). The findings suggest these statements exhibit characteristics consistent with the actus reus of incitement and contribute to inferring mens rea for genocide. The paper concludes that forensic linguistic analysis reveals systematic discursive strategies in official Israeli rhetoric that are pertinent to establishing genocidal intent under international law, thereby providing a linguistic evidential basis for South Africa’s claims at the ICJ

Keywords:

Genocide, Forensic Linguistics, International Court of Justice, Israel, Palestine

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aksar, Y. (2009). Implementing international humanitarian law: From the ad hoc tribunals to a permanent International Criminal Court. Routledge.

Amnesty International. (2024). 'You feel like you are subhuman': Israel’s genocide against Palestinians in Gaza (Index: MDE 15/8668/2024). Amnesty International Ltd.

Benesch, S. (2014). The Ghost of Incitement to Genocide. In D. Moeckli, S. Shah, & S. Sivakumaran (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law (pp. 503-528). Oxford University Press.

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Routledge.

Diakonia International Humanitarian Law Centre. (2024, February). ICJ Contentious Case South Africa v. Israel: Questions and Answers. Diakonia International Humanitarian Law Centre.

Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258-284). Sage.

Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Blackwell.

International Court of Justice (ICJ). (2024, January 26). Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel), Order. General List No. 192.

ICTR. (2007). Nahimana et al. (Media case) Appeal Judgement. Case No. ICTR-99-52-A.

Jones, A. (2017). Genocide: A comprehensive introduction (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Kreß, C. (2006). The Crime of Genocide under International Law. International Criminal Law Review, 6(4), 461-502. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181206778996481

Mettraux, G. (2005). International crimes and the ad hoc tribunals. Oxford University Press.

Olsson, J. (2008). Forensic linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum.

Pandey, P., & Pandey, M. M. (2015). Research methodology: Tools and techniques. Bridge Center.

Pujiati, P., Lundeto, A., & Trianto, I. (2025). Representing Arab-Indonesian identity: Language and cultural narratives on social media. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 653-666. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i3.78286

Schabas, W. A. (2009). Genocide in international law: The crime of crimes (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

South Africa. (2023, December 28). Application instituting proceedings and request for the indication of provisional measures (South Africa v. Israel). International Court of Justice.

South Africa. (2024, March 6). Urgent request and application for the indication of additional provisional measures and the modification of the Court’s prior provisional measures decisions pursuant to Article 41 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice and Articles 75 and 76 of the Rules of Court of the International Court of Justice (Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel)). International Court of Justice.

Stanton, G. H. (2013). Ten stages of genocide. Genocide Watch.

Sternberg, M. (2008). Biblical poetics and sexual politics. Indiana University Press.

United Nations. (1948). Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. United Nations Treaty Series, 78, 277.

United Nations. (1998). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (U.N. Doc. A/CONF.183/9).

Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-371). Blackwell.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250

Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 62-85). Sage.

Wilson, R. A. (2017). Incitement on trial: Prosecuting international speech crimes. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

How to Cite

Hafni , I. bin S. ., & Wahyudi, J. . . (2026). Israel’s Genocidal Intent: South Africa’s Claim at the ICJ Based on Forensic Linguistic Analysis. Proceedings of the Conference on International Visions and Transformative Actions for Society, 1, 952-961. https://doi.org/10.29407/w1665963

Similar Articles

1-10 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.