Keywords
Employee performance
Gambia Ports Authority
Training
Organizational prioritization
How to Cite
Abstract
Research aim: This study aimed to assess the influence of motivation on employee performance within the Gambia Ports Authority (GPA). Design/Methode/Approach: A descriptive survey design was employed, utilizing structured questionnaires to gather primary data. The study employed simple random sampling to select participants. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software, including reliability testing via Cronbach’s Alpha, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple regression analysis to test hypotheses.
Research Finding: The research highlights the significant impact of various motivational factors on employee performance within GPA. Training, organizational prioritization, and investment in development programs were found to positively influence performance (89.10%). Additionally, positive working conditions (81.70%), employee recognition (79.90%), and delegation of responsibility (74.90%) were identified as crucial contributors to an optimal work environment. The study also underscores the motivating effects of salary, bonuses, and benefits, emphasizing the importance of compensation structures. Moreover, positive relationships with superiors, peer dynamics, and effective management styles were recognized as pivotal in driving employee performance and organizational success.
Theoretical contribution/Originality: This study contributes to the understanding of the relationship between motivation and employee performance, specifically within the context of GPA. It emphasizes the importance of various motivational factors and their impact on organizational outcomes.
Practitioner/Policy implication: The findings suggest the necessity for GPA to implement a comprehensive strategy addressing motivational factors to cultivate a highly productive workforce. Recommendations include conducting a thorough assessment of the current motivational landscape within the organization to identify challenges and barriers hindering high motivation levels.
Research limitation: One limitation of this study is its focus on GPA, which may limit the generalizability of findings to other organizational contexts. Additionally, reliance on self-reported data through questionnaires may introduce response bias.
References
Butkus RT, Green TB. Motivation, beliefs, and organizational transformation. Bloomsbury Publishing USA; 1999 Jun 30.
Creswell JW, Clark VL, Gutmann ML, Hanson WE. ADVANCED MIXED. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2003:209.
Ekundayo OA. The Impact of Motivation on Employee Performance in Selected Insurance Companies in Nigeria. International Journal of African Development. 2018;5(1):5.
Gall MD, Borg WR, Gall JP. Educational research: An introduction. Longman Publishing; 1996.
Ghebregiorgis F, Karsten L. Human resource management and performance in a developing country: The case of Eritrea. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2007 Feb 1;18(2):321-32.
Latham GP, Locke EA, Fassina NE. The high performance cycle: Standing the test of time. Psychological management of individual performance. 2002 Mar 2;5(6):201-8.
Lunenburg FC. Goal-setting theory of motivation. International journal of management, business, and administration. 2011 Nov 1;15(1):1-6.
Magembe EJ. Assessment of Factors Hindering Employee’s Motivation in the Education Sector: A case of Kinondoni Municipality (Doctoral dissertation, Mzumbe University).
Mambile C, Machuve D. Web based Approach to overcome the Market Information Gap between poultry farmers and potential buyers in Tanzania.
Markey R, Ravenswood K, Webber DJ. The impact of the quality of the work environment on employees’ intention to quit. Economics Working Paper Series. 2012 Jan 21;1220:1-33.
Maslow AH. Conflict, frustration, and the theory of threat. In Contemporary Psychopathology: A Source Book 1943 Dec 31 (pp. 588-594). Harvard University Press.