The Effect of Student Integrity on Academic Fraud: Dimensions of Fraud Pentagon Theory (Case Study on Students at SMAN 2 AIKMEL)

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Apr 6, 2023
Keywords:
Student Integrity, Fraud Pentagon, Academic Cheating, SMAN 2 Aikmel

Main Article Content

Widia Febriana
University of Bumigora
Rini Anggriani
University of Bumigora
R. Ayu Ida Aryani
University of Bumigora

Abstract

Research aim : This study was conducted to examine the effect of student integrity on the tendency of academic fraud to occur using the fraud pentagon perspective.


Design/Method/Approach : This research was conducted at SMAN 2 Aikmel, East Lombok Regency, using primary data by distributing questionnaires to collect data and determine respondents based on non-probability sampling and purposive sampling. In accordance with the predetermined criteria, the questionnaire was given to students and students at SMAN 2 Aikel. The proposed hypothesis was tested using multiple regression analysis.


Research Finding : The results showed that pentagon cheating had a positive effect on academic cheating, and student integrity had a negative effect on academic cheating.


Theoretical contribution/Originality : -


Practitionel/Policy implication : -


Research limitation : -

Article Details

How to Cite
Febriana, W., Anggriani, R., & Aryani, R. A. I. (2023). The Effect of Student Integrity on Academic Fraud: Dimensions of Fraud Pentagon Theory: (Case Study on Students at SMAN 2 AIKMEL). Kilisuci International Conference on Economic &Amp; Business, 1, 116–122. Retrieved from https://proceeding.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/kilisuci/article/view/2736
Issue
Vol. 1 (2023): Proceeding Kilisuci International Conference on Economic and Business
Section
Articles

References

Nasir R. Mencari Tipologi Format Pendidikan Ideal Pondok Pesantren Di Tengah Arus Perubahan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2005.

Artani KTB, Wetra IW. Pengaruh Academic Self Efficacy Dan Fraud Diamond Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi Di Bali. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi 2017;7(2):123–132. http://jurnal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/JUARA/article.

Kushartanti A. Perilaku Menyontek ditinjau dari Kepercayaan Diri. Indigenious, Jurnal Imliah Berkala Psikologi 2009;11(2):38–46.

Purnamasari D. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kecurangan akademik pada mahasiswa. Educational Psychology Journal 2013;2(1):13–21.

Albrecht WS. Fraud Examinaton (Fourth Edition). South-Western: Cengange Learning; 2012.

Yusof KM, Ahmad KA, Jon S. Fraudulent Financial Reporting: An Application of Fraud Models to Malaysian Public Listed Companies. The Macrotheme Review 2015;4(3).

Fuad K. Pengaruh Independensi, Kompetensi, dan Prosedur Audit Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Dalam Pendeteksian Fraud. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi 2015;7(1).

Wolfe DT, Hermanson DR. The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. CPA Journal 2004;74(12):38-42.

Marks J. Playing offense in a High-risk Environment: Crowe Horwath LLP; 2010.

Crowe H. Article on Fraud. Crowe Horwath LLP; 2011.

Jusup AH. Auditing. Yogyakarta: STIE YKPN; 2010.

Supriyadi D. Integritas Akademik. MMR UGM; 2012.

Rangkuti AM. Academic cheating behavior of accounting students: a case study in Jakarta State University. Journal Educational Integrity: Culture and Values 2011:105-109.

Ghozali I. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro; 2011.