The Role of Psychodrama Techniques in Group Guidance to Improve Students' Learning Activeness: A Quasi-Experimental Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29407/dmvttc59Abstract
Learning activeness is an important factor in learning success, yet many students remain reluctant to ask questions, take part in discussions, or express opinions. This study examined the effectiveness of group guidance with psychodrama techniques in improving students' learning activeness. A quasi-experimental study with a non-equivalent control group design was conducted at SMAN 3 Kediri, East Java, between 29 April and 13 May 2026. From a population of 69 tenth-grade students (classes X-11 and X-12), 14 students whose screening scores fell in the low category were selected through purposive sampling and allocated by intact class: seven students from X-12 formed the experimental group (group guidance with psychodrama) and seven students from X-11 formed the control group (group guidance with Focus Group Discussion). Both groups received four sessions on identical themes, led by the same group facilitator. Learning activeness was measured with a four-point Likert scale adapted from Ummah (2019); item analysis on a separate tryout sample of 72 students (df = 70; critical r = .232) retained 35 of 38 items, with item-total correlations of .276-.702 and Cronbach's Alpha of .907. The data met the assumptions of normality (Shapiro-Wilk, all p > .05) and homogeneity of variance (Levene's F = 3.369, p = .091), and the two groups were equivalent at pre-test, t(12) = -0.784, p = .448. The experimental group's mean rose from 68.29 to 109.43, t(6) = -29.652, p < .001, whereas the control group showed no significant change, t(6) = 1.050, p = .334. Mean N-Gain was 57.39% (moderately effective) for the experimental group and -1.01% (not effective) for the control group. The post-test difference between groups was significant, t(12) = 25.918, p < .001, MD = 41.286, 95% CI [37.815, 44.756]. Psychodrama can therefore serve as an effective alternative technique within group guidance services, although the small sample limits generalisation
Keywords:
Group Guidance, Psychodrama, Learning Activeness, Quasi-Experiment, Senior High School StudentsDownloads
References
Amanah, S. N., Silva, N., & Muna, N. R. (2024). Penerapan bimbingan dan konseling dengan teknik psikodrama dalam lingkup pendidikan. Merpsy Journal, 16(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.22441/merpsy.v16i1.24515
Choirun, N. M., & Setiawati, D. (2019). Penerapan bimbingan kelompok teknik psikodrama untuk meningkatkan regulasi emosi peserta didik SMA Negeri 2 Lamongan. Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling UNESA, 1-7.
Corey, G. (2020). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Farida Payon, F., Andrian, D., & Mardikarini, S. (2021). Faktor yang mempengaruhi keaktifan belajar peserta didik kelas III SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Kontekstual, 2(2), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.46772/kontekstual.v2i02.397
Febrianti, C., & Irmayanti, R. (2019). Teknik psikodrama dalam bimbingan kelompok untuk mengatasi perilaku merokok siswa SMA. FOKUS (Kajian Bimbingan & Konseling dalam Pendidikan), 2(3), 105. https://doi.org/10.22460/fokus.v2i3.4631
Firmansyah, D., & Dede. (2022). Teknik pengambilan sampel umum dalam metodologi penelitian. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Holistik, 1(2), 85-114.
Fitriani, Samsudin, A., & Sari, R. O. (2024). Efektivitas bimbingan kelompok dengan teknik psikodrama untuk meningkatkan efikasi diri siswa kelas VIII MTs. Fokus, 7(2), 121-128. https://doi.org/10.22460/fokusv7i2.20174
Folastri, S., Rangka, I. B., & Rahmaniah, A. (2021). Prosedur layanan bimbingan dan konseling kelompok (Vol. 4).
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Indiana University.
Hastjarjo, T. D. (2019). Rancangan eksperimen-kuasi. Buletin Psikologi, 27(2), 187. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.38619
Hermanita, W., Asyah, N., & Lisma, E. (2020). Pengaruh layanan bimbingan kelompok teknik Focus Group Discussion (FGD) terhadap etika berkomunikasi siswa SMK Negeri 1 Perbaungan. Empaty: Guidance and Counseling Journal, 1(1), 1-9.
Hidayatullah, M. S., & Shadiqi, M. A. (2020). Konstruksi alat ukur psikologi. Universitas Lambung Mangkurat.
Karimah, N., Rasimin, & Andiyaksa, R. (2022). Identifikasi tingkat keaktifan belajar siswa di SMP Negeri 1 Kota Jambi. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(2), 12972-12977.
Khairi, A., & Yustiana, Y. R. (2018). Bimbingan kelompok teknik psikodrama untuk meningkatkan keyakinan diri akademik peserta didik. International Conference on Islamic Guidance and Counseling, 1(1), 104-112.
Nurfaizal. (2016). Penggunaan teknik psikodrama untuk meningkatkan konsep diri siswa. Jurnal Fokus Konseling, 2(2), 160-172.
Oktarina, V., Mulyani, R. R., & Triyono. (2022). Efektivitas layanan bimbingan kelompok menggunakan teknik psikodrama terhadap kecerdasan emosional peserta didik di SMAN 1 Lintau Buo Kabupaten Tanah Datar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 4(6), 6597-6609.
Pohan, R. A. (2020). Efektivitas layanan bimbingan kelompok dalam meningkatkan aktivitas respon belajar. Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 4(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.29240/jbk.v4i1.1280
Prasetyo, A. D., & Abduh, M. (2021). Peningkatan keaktifan belajar siswa melalui model discovery learning di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 1717-1724. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.991
Rokhanah, N., Widowati, A., & Sutanto, E. H. (2021). Peningkatan keaktifan belajar siswa dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD). Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(5), 3173-3180. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i5.860
Romlah, T. (2020). Teori dan praktek bimbingan dan konseling. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Sari, S. P. (2017). Teknik psikodrama dalam mengembangkan kontrol diri siswa. Jurnal Fokus Konseling, 3(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.26638/jfk.386.2099
Satun, C., & Setiawati, D. (2020). Meningkatkan resiliensi akademik pada siswa dengan prestasi belajar rendah di SMK Negeri 5 Surabaya. Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling UNESA, 214-220.
Septiawati, Halidjah, S., & Ghasya, D. A. V. (2022). Deskripsi keaktifan belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran tematik kelas V. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 11(6), 168. https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v11i6.55276
Setiawan, D., Mukromin, & Firdaus. (2025). Metode Focus Group Discussion (FGD) dalam peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas VIII pada mata pelajaran PAI. Reflection: Islamic Education Journal, 2(3), 10-28.
Subhaktiyasa, P. G. (2024). Evaluasi validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian kuantitatif: Sebuah studi pustaka. Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(4), 5599-5609.
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Ummah, M. S. (2019). Kisi-kisi tingkat keaktifan belajar siswa.
Zakiyah, S. (2017). Metodologi penelitian quasi eksperimen. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penelitian, 1(1), 25-36.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rinda Octa Hestida Putri, Ikke Yuliani Dhian Puspitarini , Yuanita Dwi Kri\ (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
